top of page

 

Legal Cases and Informative Strategies

J.D. v. Colonial Williamsburg Incident:

   - Case: A child with severe gluten intolerance was denied permission to bring his homemade gluten-free meal into a restaurant, leading to a lawsuit for discrimination under the ADA.

   - Prevention: Global Guard Cards detailing his gluten intolerance could have facilitated better understanding and accommodation by the restaurant staff, ensuring the child's safety and protecting the business from legal action (Post & Schell, P.C.).

 

The Cheesecake Factory Incident:

   - Case: A woman with a nut allergy suffered an anaphylactic reaction after being served a dish containing pecans despite informing the staff of her allergy.

   - Prevention: Global Guard Cards could have reinforced the allergy information, ensuring proper handling by the staff, thereby safeguarding the customer and preventing a lawsuit against the restaurant (Post & Schell, P.C.).

 

Nobu Matsuhisa Incident:

   - Case: A customer experienced a severe allergic reaction to shellfish at Nobu Matsuhisa, despite informing the staff multiple times about her allergy.

   - Prevention: Global Guard Cards could have prompted more thorough checks, ensuring the customer’s safety and protecting the business from legal repercussions (Post & Schell, P.C.).

 

Pret A Manger Incident:

   - Case: Natasha Ednan-Laperouse died after consuming a baguette containing sesame seeds, which were not listed on the packaging, leading to a major lawsuit and the enactment of "Natasha's Law" for better food labeling.

   - Prevention: Clear labeling and Global Guard Cards could have provided critical information to avoid the fatal incident, ensuring customer safety and protecting the business from severe legal consequences (Post & Schell, P.C.).

Patient Transfer Miscommunication:

   - Case: Numerous errors occur during patient transfers between healthcare providers, leading to preventable harm and potential lawsuits.

   - Prevention: Global Guard Cards with patient information could facilitate better communication during transfers, ensuring patient safety and protecting healthcare facilities from legal action (KQED)​​ (PSNet).

 

Medication Errors in Pharmacies:

   - Case: Pharmacies often dispense incorrect medications, such as a diabetic patient receiving the wrong medication, leading to severe complications and lawsuits.

   - Prevention: Global Guard Cards listing current medications and allergies could act as an additional check, preventing errors and ensuring the safety of patients and protecting pharmacies from legal repercussions (Anesthesiology)​.

 

Emergency Room Incident:

   - Case: A woman with a known heart condition suffered a cardiac arrest in the ER due to a lack of information during triage.

   - Prevention: Global Guard Cards with her medical history and emergency instructions could have enabled quicker, more appropriate care, ensuring patient safety and protecting the hospital from legal issues (AAMC)​.

 

Nursing Home Negligence:

   - Case: A diabetic resident in a nursing home did not receive insulin due to a shift change miscommunication, leading to a lawsuit.

   - Prevention: Global Guard Cards with detailed treatment schedules could ensure continuity of care, preventing errors and ensuring the safety of residents and protecting the nursing home from legal action (PSNet).

 

Restaurant Allergic Reaction:

   - Case: A customer with a severe shellfish allergy experienced an anaphylactic reaction after being served a dish containing shellfish.

   - Prevention: Global Guard Cards shown to both the server and kitchen staff could have prevented the incident, ensuring the customer’s safety and protecting the restaurant from legal repercussions (KQED).

Fitness Center Incident:

   - Case: A man with a known heart condition suffered a cardiac event while exercising at a fitness center. The staff was unaware of his condition and did not have immediate access to his medical history, leading to delays in providing appropriate care. The family sued the center for inadequate response.

   - Prevention: Global Guard Cards could have provided essential information to the staff, improving their response and ensuring the safety of the individual and protecting the fitness center from legal action (McKinsey & Company).

Panera Bread Incident:

   - Case: A child with a peanut allergy was served a grilled cheese sandwich with peanut butter, resulting in an allergic reaction and subsequent lawsuit.

   - Prevention: Global Guard Cards detailing the allergy could have ensured better communication, preventing cross-contamination and safeguarding both the child and the restaurant (Post & Schell, P.C.).

 

Todd Serlin vs. El Torvar Hotel:

   - Case: Todd Serlin, who has celiac disease, became ill after consuming French onion soup that was incorrectly assured to be gluten-free at the El Torvar Hotel. He later sued the hotel for negligence.

   - Prevention: Accurate communication and verification regarding food ingredients, facilitated by Global Guard Cards, could have ensured Serlin’s safety and protected the hotel from legal action (Post & Schell, P.C.).

 

Jason Reid vs. The Bazaar by Jose Andres:

   - Case: Jason Reid, who has a severe nut allergy, experienced an allergic reaction after consuming a meal at The Bazaar by Jose Andres in Miami. Despite informing the restaurant multiple times about his allergy, he was served a dish containing nuts and later sued the restaurant for failing to properly train staff.

   - Prevention: Rigorous staff training and effective communication, supported by Global Guard Cards, could have prevented the incident, ensuring customer safety and protecting the business (Post & Schell, P.C.) (Mount Sinai Today).

 

Starbucks Incident:

   - Case: In 2018, a customer experienced a severe allergic reaction after consuming a drink containing almond milk, despite specifically requesting a dairy-free option. The customer sued Starbucks for cross-contamination.

   - Prevention: Proper staff training to handle allergen-specific requests accurately, along with the use of Global Guard Cards, could have prevented the incident, ensuring customer safety and protecting the business from legal consequences (McKinsey & Company).

bottom of page